Latest Stories

Cambridge Street Aid – Helping People On The Street To Turn A Corner

There are lots of reasons why people beg on the street. Each person has their own story to tell, and mostly it'll be one we can sympathise with.

Many of us instinctively want to give money to people we think need our help, and it feels more personal when you give to someone directly.  But have you ever wondered whether you are really helping? 

csa-poster-orange-A2-v5-hires.jpgIn the view of leading charities the evidence is clear. At best your act of kindness will do no harm. At worst, and all too often, your money will get spent on drink or drugs and may help to perpetuate a miserable life which often only ends in premature death. 

It may also surprise you to know that the link between begging and having nowhere to live is not always strong.  Of course there are genuinely homeless people on the street, most of whom have very complex needs.  But many rough sleepers refuse to beg while many of the people begging have somewhere to stay.  Some even have their own tenancy.  No one needs to beg to get into a hostel: Cambridge homelessness hostels are free to enter and eligible people can claim housing benefit to meet the cost.

‎What you do with your own money is your business.  But if you don’t want to gamble on whether you may be doing more harm than good, a clear choice is to donate to Cambridge Street Aid.

Cambridge Street Aid is a fund where every penny you donate will go directly into helping to end the waste and misery of a life spent on the streets.  You can also be sure that your money will add to, not substitute for, the help provided by statutory and charitable organisations described on these pages.  Support workers, homelessness charities and other community groups can bid into the fund for things that will make a real difference to people’s lives; the only limitation being that it must help a person get off, or stay off, the streets.

So, now you don’t have to gamble when you give what will your choice be:  Loose change or REAL change?    

Cambridge Street Aid is administered by the Cambridgeshire Community Foundation.  To find out more, or to make a donation, please visit the Cambridge Street Aid page.

Cambridge Street Aid

Cambridge Street Aid – Helping People On The Street To Turn A Corner There are lots of reasons why people beg on the street. Each person has their own story...


Planning Inspectorate Appeal Decision


 Appeal Decision 

Hearing held on 23 August 2016 

Site visit made on 23 August 2016 

by Roy Merrett BSc(Hons) DipTP MRTPI 

an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government 

Decision date: 27 October 2016 


 Appeal Ref: APP/Q0505/W/16/3145912 

Land to the rear of 27 - 37 Romsey Terrace, Cambridge CB1 3NH 


 The appeal is made under section 78 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 against a failure to give notice within the prescribed period of a decision on an application for planning permission. 



 The appeal is made by Robinson College against Cambridge City Council. 



 The application Ref 15/2355/FUL, is dated 1 August 2014. 

 The development proposed is four dwellings – two semi-detached three bedroom dwellings and two semi-detached two bedroom dwellings and associated amenity space and facilitating development. 




1. The appeal is dismissed.



Romsey Labour shared residents’ disbelief this week on hearing that the central government inspectors are ignoring local requests for a hearing in Cambridge.

Having already seen the developers decide to exploit a loophole in order to take matters out of local hands (, we had hoped that at least the government inspectors would come to Cambridge to hear submissions from residents, councillors and officers. This was especially the case since East Area Committee (made up of all councillors from Romsey, Abbey, Petersfield and Coleridge) fully supported residents’ request for the inspectors to come to Cambridge, and officers made this known to the inspectors. We are therefore disappointed that there is currently a danger that the case will be decided by written submissions only.

Sophie Barnett, Romsey Labour’s City Council candidate for May 2016, has taken a keen interest in this issue, and is fully supportive of residents’ concerns. She says, “Just like when the external inspector overturned the Council’s decision on the McClaren’s development, this is another example of a planning decision being made by a centrally-appointed inspector rather than democratically-elected councillors. Local residents, in Romsey Terrace and across the City, have many concerns about this development and should be given the chance to present these to the inspector, especially since they have been denied the chance to have their views heard at a Development Control Forum.”

Romsey Labour councillors are working with residents to persuade the inspectorate to change their mind. We will keep you informed on this page.


The Development Control Forum planned for today has been cancelled by Robinson College and they have gone straight to appeal.

In doing this they have first stopped the negotiations taking place with Cambridge City Council Planners.

Second, they have cancelled discussions aimed to find a joint solution by the Development Control Forum which was to take place between them and the residents association in Romsey Terrace.

Third, I hope this is not how the elected representatives on the City Council and the Officers are going to treated in the future? 


This proposal by Robinson College continues with another plan due to go to the Development Control Forum on 9-3-16.  Local councillors are supporting the residents association in this.


We have again met with the residents association and advised them on how they may continue to challenge the development.


"Well I suppose we never really thought this planning application would reflect the view of residents - but we are disappointed that it ignored our views completely"

A quote from a local resident about the 'new' plans by Robinson College for Romsey Terrace sums it all up.  Robinson College's latest PR exercise was hardly glitzy but it was a charm offensive with four very pleasant people helping visitors to 'understand'.

The new plans though were little different to the earlier plans that were withdrawn and represent a gross overdevelopment.  The best thing really is for Robinson College to sit down with residents and try to talk this through.



Cllr. Dave Baigent signed the petition against this development on Saturday.



Plans have now been submitted for the proposed development of five dwellings - two semi-detached three-bedroom dwellings and three terraces two-bedroom dwellings and associated amenity space and facilitating development.


It is likely that this application will be amongst the first to go to the new centralised planning arrangements that were a feature of Labours May 2014 Manifesto.  

I WILL, as promised, be asking for this development to be rejected.


More details can be found by going to the council's planning pages at and entering Romsey Terrace



For a moment it appeared that Robinson College's plans to develop accommodation the car park in Romsey Terrace were on hold, but now the issue has come alive again after residents discovered that agents were resubmitting plans and trying to limit the amount of time for objections. 

A meeting was quickly called by residents and Dave attended along with 10 other local people.

Serious concerns were raised at the meeting about some of the communications between council officers and the agents and these can be found at .  There is a lot of documentation here, but people who are involved in objecting may find it beneficial to take the time to read through all of them.

Dave was able to suggest that the campaigners should

  1. try to step up their public campaign,  
  2. ask to meet with the Master and Fellows of Robinson College
  3. take their concerns to East Area Committee.

Roy Stamp is coordinating the action plan and your labour councillors remain ready to help.


IMG_3365.jpg Two of the three residents I met with (23-4-14) 

Round One to the residents of Romsey Terrace  (9-5-14)

There were over 20 objections, by letter, by email or online to the planning application by Robinson College for Romsey Terrace.  They came from concerned residents, mainly in Romsey Terrace and Coleridge Road.

Clearly, residents have made an impact and achieved a great result as the planning officer is going to recommend refusal of this application, which is a great result.



Dave was appalled at the lack of consideration shown by Robinson College for you and the impact on your lives by their proposal.  On the other hand it was impressive to see the way your community acted together, to register complaints and attend the meeting on the 24-4-14 to make your voices heard.

I will continue to keep watch on developments in case there is an appeal, or if other applications are made on this site. If this happens, I will meet with residents again to get your opinions.

I must add that it was impressive to see the way your community acted together to make your voices heard by attending the meeting on the 24-4-14 and registering objections.  I was equally appalled at the lack of consideration shown by Robinson College for you and the impact on your lives by their proposal.  

If I get elected on May 22nd I will continue to stand alongside you in your campaign and under Labour's proposed arrangements for planning I all be able to represent your views.

My campaigns against inappropriate and over-development on Cromwell and Mill Road are both very visible examples of what I am capable of achieving. I am a doer, which is something I've learned from a lifetime of public service.

Politics needs some new faces and I hope you can recognise my sincerity in wanting to be one of those.  If elected I will continue to listen and to represent the voice of Romsey because only by doing that will I fulfil my pledge, which is to work hard to make the ‘town’ where I live a better place.



Dave was invited to an open meeting on Monday (28-4-14) at the Deaf Centre in Romsey Terrace by residents concerned about plans by Robinson College to build 10 flats on a car park and a grassed area.

"I am so glad that I went because there were 40 plus people there who all were very concerned about their loss of car parking space and the extra housing in a road already full." 

This looks like another one of those land grabbing projects that will make money for the owners and fill in another small open space.  How long will it be before the council actually wake up to the fact that these sort of planning applications are not just for 2014 but taking away important spaces in Romsey for ever with all the loss that means for us and our environment? 



The owner of the land is actually Robinson College and they are just acting like speculators - where is their moral compass?

Why is it that Robinson College thinks its OK to take away a car park and a green space to put in more accommodation?  I don't think it is to house their students. I am told that the college want to get planning permission and then sell the land.  If this is right then its about profit and the market is not taking care of residents needs but putting money in developers and Robinson College's pockets.

The LibDem manifesto talks about 'ensuring the city retains its compact character surrounded by green belt' but at what stage will they call a halt?  When will enough be enough? 

I share the residents concerns and will support them. 




Inspector turns down Robinson College's plans for Romsey Terrace

28-10-16 Planning Inspectorate Appeal Decision    Appeal Decision  Hearing held on 23 August 2016  Site visit made on 23 August 2016  by Roy Merrett BSc(Hons) DipTP MRTPI  an Inspector appointed...


A TWELVE-WEEK consultation on proposals to change the way Cambridge City Council manages moorings alongside its land by the River Cam gets under way on 27 October.

The consultation invites views on a number of elements of the council’s approach to moorings. 

As well as being a treasured feature of the city, the Cam has become one of the busiest inland waterways in the UK and is a popular destination for a wide range of recreational activities. 


The council has already listened to the views of a number of river boat dwellers through public questions at committee and at full council meetings.

It wishes to apologise to those people who felt the first draft of the consultation document, considered at committee, was not sufficiently clear, and who thought it gave an inaccurate picture of those living on the river. 

The council fully recognises the community of people living on the river and their contribution to Cambridge society, and wishes to engage positively with them, and with other river users, in setting future moorings policy.

The consultation document seeks to make very clear the council’s intention to support those people who live on the river, not only during the consultation but through its services delivered day to day. 

The consultation asks river users, residents and others to give views on a series of proposals including:

Basing mooring licence fees on boat length

The council currently charges a licence fee irrespective of boat length. Previous consultations have shown boaters with smaller vessels believe this to be unfair and research shows that in other parts of the country there are different fees according to boat length.

Responding to safety concerns by stopping mooring at the Riverside wall


A number of options have been reviewed in the past but no feasible solution has been found to provide cost-effective, safe access to and from moored boats and the adjoining river wall on this part of the river. Residents have rightly expressed concern, and the consultation seeks to consider how the council could mitigate the impact on those currently using the area. Any boat we have regulated to moor at Riverside wall which has people living aboard will be offered alternative moorings on the Cam and will not lost their home.

Reviewing the fees charged for mooring on council land

The council has previously committed to reviewing fees and charges to ensure that they are fair. Charges should not only cover the costs of operating the mooring service, but make a contribution to the services provided by the council to the wider Cambridge community.


The location, type and number of mooring berths, provision for visitor moorings and penalties for those who overstay, a revised enforcement policy and ways of managing mooring waiting lists are among other topics covered in the consultation.

Cllr Richard Robertson, Executive Councillor for Finance and Resources, said: “This is an open consultation and no outcomes have been assumed or decisions made. Every comment we receive will be carefully considered and used to inform and shape the final policy, which will be presented to councillors.


“We are absolutely committed to listening to people’s views and to working closely with all those directly affected by these proposals. 

“It’s really important that we have a clear and transparent approach to moorings because the Cam is a very busy waterway and an important part of our city environment.

“This consultation is about being open and fair to boaters, residents and other river users.”

A report is set to be presented to Strategy and Resources Scrutiny Committee on 23 March informing councillors about the outcomes of the consultation and the council’s revised River Cam moorings policy.

The consultation will run until 20 January and details will be published on the council’s website at Printed details are available by calling Tracy Okten on 01223 457478.

The consultation began on 27 October and will ask river users, residents and others to put forward their views on a number of proposals including:










Consultation on Moorings Management Policy

TIME TO HAVE YOUR SAY ON RIVER MOORINGS A TWELVE-WEEK consultation on proposals to change the way Cambridge City Council manages moorings alongside its land by the River Cam gets...

More Stories >

The Labour Party will place cookies on your computer to help us make this website better.

Please read this to review the updates about which cookies we use and what information we collect on our site.

To find out more about these cookies, see our privacy notice. Use of this site confirms your acceptance of these cookies.